Business Finance Homework Help

Discussion #1: https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/blackboard.lear…

Respond using the normal posting guidelines concerning your initial post and follow-up posts.

Please review the attached article and post your response and follow-up responses in accordance with prior guidelines.

Do you agree or disagree with the the authors? What about B players or C players? What type of player are you? How do you know?

Discussion #2: https://www.bcg.com/

Review the HBS case: George Martin at The Boston Consulting Group.

The goal is to analyze the case and develop your thoughts and insight based upon research, logic, decision making. Your work should be no less than 5-7 pages (excluding cover page and reference pages), formatted in the APA style and have at least five supporting references.

There are no case question prompts for this case. You must review the case, determine what you believe are the critical issues, analyze and provide recommendations.

Discussion #3: Attached chapter 6 (Stakeholder Analysis and Communication Planning)

1) Identify what you thought was the one most important concept(s), method(s), and/or specific item that you felt was worthy of your understanding from the Key Terms on page 200.

2) Discuss in detail what the term means, how it is used and other pertinent information about the selected term including a specific example, application or case study from your own experience. Be specific; not vague or general.

3) Provide a detailed discussion of why you thought this selection is important and how it relates overall to creating or maintaining stakeholder engagement.

Respond to the post of at least two peers, using 100 words minimum each.

Your initial post should be based upon the assigned reading for the week, so the textbook should be a source listed in your reference section and cited within the body of the text. Other sources are not required but feel free to use them if they aid in your discussion.

Your initial post should be at least 450+ words and in APA format (including Times New Roman with font size 12 and double spaced). Post the actual body of your paper in the discussion thread then attach a Word version of the paper for APA review. Do not use lists or bullet points. This will result in substantial loss of points in the Substance section and the Requirements section.

Discussion #4:

Essay Question #6: Describe the plan-do-check-act model and how you would use it to plan, conduct and improve project meetings.

The assignment is to answer the question provided above in essay form. This is to be in narrative form. Bullet points should not to be used. The paper should be at least 1.5 – 2 pages in length, Times New Roman 12-pt font, double-spaced, 1 inch margins and utilizing at least one outside scholarly or professional source related to project management. This does not mean blogs or websites. This source should be a published article in a scholarly journal (Journal of Project Management) or a professional journal (such as PMI’s Project Management Journal). This source should provide substance and not just be mentioned briefly to fulfill this criteria. The textbook should also be utilized. Do not use quotes. Do not insert excess line spacing. APA formatting and citiation should be used.