100 words agree or disagree to each question

Question 1.

There are some matters wherein it seems as if the power exercised by the Supreme Court is either too little or too much. I do not think it is a problem for the Court to have the power that they do, however, there are some rulings that I personally do not agree with.

As we have already ascertained Judicial Review is the Supreme Court’s ability to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution.[1] This doctrine established in the  Marbury v. Madison (1803)[2] case that paved the way for the Supreme Court to exercise authority over federal legislation. The two provisions to this power are found in Article III[3] and Article VI[4] of the Constitution. Since the Constitution is supreme,  the Supreme Court then decides whether or not legislation is Constitutional and makes decisions on cases concerning the Constitution.

The intent of the framers was to ensure that the power of judicial review was transparent and somewhat separate from the structure of government. It is also possible that the framers did not think that the issue would ever arise since Congress would never pass legislation outside of its enumerated powers.

Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S.(2015)

Synopsis: Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S.(2015)[5] , a group of same-sex couples who had initially sued their respective states, namely Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee. Their purpose was to challenge the states bans on same-sex marriage and refusal in recognizing the legality of same-sex marriages which took place in jurisdictions that provided for such marriages. The Supreme Court held “that theses states’ statutes violated the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment”  and under the Civil Rights Act.[6]

Did the Supreme overuse its power in this case? The Supreme Court held that states bands prohibiting same- sex marriages were to be struck down. It also stated that because of equality in the eyes of the law the constitution grants them that right. The right to same-sex marriage was read into the Constitution, with the Court playing social policy maker instead of judge.  This was an issue to be resolved by the states. Instead, the Supreme Court chose to make rather broad claims regarding social policy and created a right to same-sex marriage under the Constitution.

[1] About the Supreme Court | United States Courts. t

[2] Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 2 L. Ed. 60, 1803 U.S. LEXIS 352, 1 Cranch 137 (Supreme Court of the United States February 24, 1803, Decided ). Retrieved from

[3] U.S. Constitution Article III: Section 2; The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution

[4] U.S. Constitution Article VI; This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land;

[5] Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584, 192 L. Ed. 2d 609, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 4250, 83 U.S.L.W. 4592, 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P45,341, 115 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2015-2309, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 472 (Supreme Court of the United States June 26, 2015, Decided). Retrieved from

[6] Amendment XIV, Section 1: Equal Protection.

Question 2.

I do not think that it?s a problem for the Supreme Court to have the powers of judicial review this is on account of it being the highest judicial body in the land. Also, there would be a new problem if the Supreme Court did not have Judicial Review powers one being there would be no other body left to stop unconstitutional laws from being implemented. Hence it makes sense that the Court has this power especially considering that judicial powers are derived from the logic of the constitution (Kautz, Kautz, Melzer, Weinberger, & Zinman, 2011). Although there is a risk that this makes the court even more paramount than the legislature which might not be what the framers intended, the fact that the Supreme Court refers to the constitution makes it okay. This is because, in the modern age where there is lobbying among other factors in the legislature, the people need more protection than perhaps the framers of the constitution anticipated. Thus, the Judicial Review by the Supreme Court facilitates a channel where new laws can be fact-checked to the constitution and right of citizens can be protected.
Although origins of Judicial Review are not found in the constitution, it’s inferred in the text. Furthermore, the Supreme Court initially depended on the 1789 Judiciary Act which mandated it to give specific orders that compelled government officials to act in accordance with the law (Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts , 2019). Subsequently, in Marbury V. Madison the Court faced a case which raised a question whether the legislature or it represented the supreme law on the land. The court rationalized that since the constitution represented the supreme law as per Article IV, and that Congress Acts that were not in accordance could not stand. Hence, it noted and established that in it had a duty to strike down any laws that violated the constitution just as asserted by the 1789 Act (Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, 2019). According to Kautz, Kautz, Melzer, Weinberger, & Zinman, (2011), the framers might not have intended for judicial review, however, the logic is inferred in the text of the constitution.
As anticipated, the powers of judicial review have in modern times been able to protect the citizens. It?s important to recall that framers intended to ensure that liberty of the masses was preserved by the constitution. Throughout history, people have become more conscious of their rights and have relied on the constitution to protect them. However, this would not be possible especially where a minority whose personal practices are not in line with the views of the majority are concerned. For instance, in Obergeffell V. Hodges same-sex couples demanded that their rights to marriage be respected, their demands were denied in the district courts. However, the Supreme Court found that marriage was a right for all persons as indicated in the fourteenth amendment (Obergefell v. Hodges, 2018). In this case, the judicial review facilitated justice for a minority demography despite traditions and majority perceptions indicating dislike. In this instance, the power of judicial review illustrates how it makes the constitution more dynamic to changing circumstances in the modern world.

Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. (2019). About the Supreme Court. Retrieved from United States Court:

Kautz, S., Kautz, S., Melzer, A., Weinberger, J., & Zinman, R. (2011). The Supreme Court and the Idea of Constitutionalism. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Obergefell v. Hodges. (2018, November). Obergefell v. Hodges. Retrieved from Legal Dictionary:

Question 3.

During this week’s reading we reviewed Articles of the U.S. Constitution. Article III of the Constitution establishes and empowers the judicial branch of the government. The judicial branch is the system of courts that look at the law and apply it to different cases. In the United States, the judicial branch of the government includes the United States Supreme Court and all the lower court that are created by Congress. Article III, Section I states that “the judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme court and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”

Although not in the constitution, allowing courts to have this power allows for there to be a democracy in our country. Judicial review of the government was established in the landmark decision of Marbury v. Madison. There have been multiple cases in which the Court used the power of judicial review to declare acts by federal/state government were voided because it contradicted one of the constitutional provisions. After analyzing the tenth amendment in which Cornell Law School (n.d)., defines it has the concept of federalism, in which any power that is not given to the federal government is given to the people or the states. This created the establishment and division of power between the Federal government and state government. The Framers did not necessarily express the intent to give the courts such power, but similar to what Linder (n.d) stated in his article, through the use of judicial power there was a clear structure of government. The third possibility could also be contemplated in which the framers did not foresee this issue to ever come up because Congress would have never passed legislation outside of its powers.

In the case of Obergefell v. Hodges, same sex couples sued their respective state challenging the constitutionality of those states ‘ban on same sex marriages or refusal to recognize legal same sex marriages. Section 1 of the 14thAmendment states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” (NCC, n.d.). In this case the court did exercise judicial review effectively. Among all the court cases that were presented, the individuals that were suing had a situation that needed a sense of urgency for the court to give them their right in their state. The courts examined the nature of fundamental rights, the harm or new laws being requested by the individuals, and each individual case. The judicial review that was conducted to determine if law/decisions by the legislative/executive branches or any courts of the state is constitutional. After the court conducted the review and sided with the plaintiffs, same sex marriages were allowed to be recognized, allowed to marry and here I am today in the military with my wife.

I do believe it was proper execution of power because there was no new law that was being requested. It was a request that was already in the constitution but was thought to be gender specific. There is no harm being done to anyone, rather allowing legalities for ourselves as citizen in our country. If I was diagnosed with cancer and I had children, my wife now could handle that she would need to thereafter.


Cornell Law School. Legal Information Institute. (n.d). Tenth Amendment. Retrieved from

Linder, D. (n.d.). Exploring Constitutional Conflicts. Retrieved from

National Constitution Center (n.d.) The 14thAmendment of the U.S. Constitution. Retrieved from


"Our Prices Start at $11.99. As Our First Client, Use Coupon Code GET15 to claim 15% Discount This Month!!"


Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read Chapter 3 in An Introduction to Crime Scene Investigation, the two court cases, and the rulings in the required resources.
Before any scientific evidence can be used in court, including what we commonly refer to as forensic evidence, the court must determine whether that evidence is admissible. In 1923, in Frye v. United States, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia established what came to be known as the Frye standard. The Frye standard held that expert opinion based on a scientific technique is admissible only where the technique is generally accepted as reliable in the relevant scientific community.
Seventy years later, in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the Court of the United States held that the Federal Rules of Evidence superseded the Frye standard as the standard of admissibility. Some states, however, still follow the Frye standard.
After reviewing the required materials and conducting your own independent research into the relevant issues below by reviewing law review articles, treatises, and related cases using Westlaw in the Ashford University Library or another legal research site. Try looking in Legal Search Engines, Directories, and Other Research Tools in the Southern Illinois University School of Law Library (Links to an external site.), which has links to numerous legal research sites.
The Legal Issues Analysis paper must include the following elements:

  • Discuss the current legal standard for introduction of scientific evidence.
  • Review the history of the standard.
  • Compare and analyze the Daubert standard, the Frye standard, and Rule 702.
  • Discuss whether your state uses the Daubert standard or the Frye standard.
  • Evaluate whether Daubert or Frye is the more appropriate standard.
  • Evaluate the current standard. Is it satisfactory? If yes, why? If no, what would be a better standard?

The Legal Issues Analysis paper

"Our Prices Start at $11.99. As Our First Client, Use Coupon Code GET15 to claim 15% Discount This Month!!"

Criminal homework help

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, please review the article Blended Sentencing Laws and the Punitive Turn in Juvenile Justice (Schaefer and Uggen, 2016). In addition, please review resources included in your Week 3 Annotated Bibliography assignment. Finally, examine the Building a More Just Society case scenarios multimedia below.
The Final Paper
You will prepare a four to six-page paper that addresses the questions below which relate to each of the three sections for the case of People v. Joey Juvenile. There are three sections for discussion with two sub-parts that need to be addressed within each section. The best way to present your paper will be with sub-headings which address each of the “Issue and Process Summaries” listed below.
Be sure to include at least three reliable/credible sources other than the textbook, at least one of which must be found in the Ashford University Library.  It is expected that you will draw resources from your Week 3 Annotated Bibliography assignment, but you may select other resources if you choose to do so.
Note: To access the Ashford University Library directly, click on the Writing Center and Library links in your left navigation. Watch the Database Search Tips (Links to an external site.) video for more and see Searching the Ashford University Library document for assignment-specific search tips.
Note: You are encouraged to integrate any feedback from your instructor and upload the assignment to your ePortfolio (Links to an external site.).
You work as a paralegal in a public defender’s office. In a current criminal case, the public defender represents Joey Juvey, a juvenile, and plans to address criminal justice issues, constitutional principles, cultural sensitivity, and diversity awareness  in the criminal trial and hopes to promote social justice goals in local communities. This is a high-profile case, meaning that the press is reporting on every aspect of the charges on both local and national programs. You have been asked to assist the public defender in preparing theories for defense which not only best benefit the defendant but also highlight the societal issues inherent in the case. To this end, you will explore processes, issues  applications for criminology, and relevant critical perspectives toward the goal of building a more just society.
Your Task
The public defender believes that her defense of Joey Juvey highlights significant criminal justice issues that the public needs to be made aware of and address. The defense lawyer sees herself in a dual function in this case; she must defend her client to the best of her abilities while seizing the opportunity to educate the public about current, critical criminal justice issues. To provide context for the public defender’s public exposure and trial strategy.
Section No. 1: Juvenile Justice, Transfer to Adult Court and the 8th Amendment:  Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Case Description (also included in the multimedia content)
The State wants to transferJoey Juvey from the juvenile justice system to the adult criminal justice system for drug related charges. He is being held in juvenile detention pending trial. If convicted as an adult, Juvey could receive a prison sentence in an adult correctional facility. He grew up and still resides in a severely impoverished community.
The public defender will claim that the correctional facility conditions violate Eighth Amendment rights due to cruel and unusual punishment in the form of overcrowded and unsafe cell conditions. She argues that cell conditions are highly unsanitary and unacceptably crowded in violation of Juvey’s constitutional rights.
Issue and Process Summary
For these issues, examine the following:

  1. The impact of transferring Juvey from the juvenile justice system to the adult criminal justice system, and
  2. Issues in this case include cell conditions within the context of the Eighth Amendment. How will the court examine the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against “cruel and unusual punishment and apply it to Juvey’s case?

Section No. 2: Juvenile Justice and the 5th Amendment Right Against Self-Incrimination
When in custody, Juvey claims that law enforcement asked incriminating questions about the investigation. While his parents were present during the custodial interrogation, law enforcement did not communicate the right to remain silent in Joey or his parents’  primary language. Everyone agrees that his parents have no understanding of the English language. Think about how cultural sensitivity should impact procedures for officers assigned to communities with diverse languages.
Issue and Process Summary
For these issues, evaluate the following:

  1. Can the State prove that Juvey understood the waiver of his Miranda rights, and
  2. How should law enforcement interact with the public and the accused in multilingual communities.

Section No. 3: Racial Make Up of Juries
The defense attorney believes that the county court system systematically fails to summon non-Caucasians for jury trials in the jurisdiction where Juvey’s case could ultimately be tried. She wants to assert that the failure to summons minorities to jury service is a violation of constitutional rights and undermines the legitimacy of the trial process. The defense lawyer has data that shows while the community is comprised 42% Caucasian and 58% minority eligible jurors, but routinely over 80% of those issued a summons to appear for jury duty are Caucasian.
Please review the case summary of Batson v. Kentucky (Links to an external site.) (1985) and Foster v. Chatman (2016) available through the webpage link under the “Required Resources” section and consider how the United States Supreme Court addresses the issue of racial discrimination within the context of juror exclusion.
Issue and Process Summary
For these issues, discuss the following:

  1. fairness in jury pool and jury selection, and
  2. the impacts of juror exclusion by race.

The Building a More Just Society paper

"Our Prices Start at $11.99. As Our First Client, Use Coupon Code GET15 to claim 15% Discount This Month!!"

Criminal homework help

Identify the strengths and weaknesses of the criminal behavior theories. Which theory do you think is most applicable to the cause of criminal behavior today and why? Support your answer.
"Our Prices Start at $11.99. As Our First Client, Use Coupon Code GET15 to claim 15% Discount This Month!!"

Law homework help

Topic: Teaching Effective Presentation Skills
"Our Prices Start at $11.99. As Our First Client, Use Coupon Code GET15 to claim 15% Discount This Month!!"

Criminal homework help

In this assignment, you will examine the Darryl Hunt case from 1984 and the impact of his release.
Research the case of State v. Hunt, a 1984 North Carolina case in which Daryl Hunt was accused of the murder of Deborah Sykes. The case can be found easily via an internet search or through the use of CTU library resources.
Assignment Guidelines

  • Address the following in 2–3 pages:
    • The blood type did not match the assailant’s; could this be ignored today? Why or why not? Explain.
    • Are crimes still tied together today? Explain.
    • With the today’s studies, it is realized that most murders or rapes are intraracial, not interracial. Should people have realized that in 1984, or was it just a matter of bigotry?
      • Use scholarly and academic resources to support your argument.
    • Take this case and make 2 scenarios:
      • Create 1 in which the perpetrator is Caucasian and 1 in which the perpetrator is a minority.
      • Explain how it would be handled in this day and time.
    • Locate 2 cases that are similar to your scenarios, and use them as scholarly sources to back up your opinions.
    • Explain the legal and ethical details pertaining to your scenarios’ individuals.
  • Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.
"Our Prices Start at $11.99. As Our First Client, Use Coupon Code GET15 to claim 15% Discount This Month!!"