Business Finance Homework Help

NO GRAMMATICAL ERRORS OR SPELLING ERRORS!! NO PLAGIARISM

READ THE INSTRUCTIONS CLEAR-FULLY!!

Here is the question you should focus on:” Does congress have the power to pass Unborn Protection Act at all”?

You are arguing FOR THE Unborn Protection Act. In other word, protection from abortion.

You must read all of the uploaded documents. I uploaded an example of how to format the paper.

YOUR JOB IS FIGURE OUT WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE CASE/ FIND THE LEGAL REASONING!!

I will attach the fictional story. PLEASE read ALL PAGES of the story very CAREFULLY!! Including the instructions and assignment page (page 7)and Hints and Final Summary(page 10).

I will also attach an example of how it can be done.

YOU DO NOT HAVE DO USE ALL OF THE CASES FOR THE STORY. YOUR JOB IS TO PROVIDE GOOD ANALYSIS AS TO WHY BE FOR THE UNBORN PROTECTION ACT!!

Constitutional Law and Politics: Struggles for Power and Governmental Accountability (Tenth Edition) (Vol. 1) is the book. You can’t access it online less you buy it, so that is why i had to uploaded photos to the book,

Scanned documents is how to format the paper!! lease READ EVERY SINGLE WORDS.

Look at the scanned documents grading key on how to format the essay!!

The way you should be answering the question should be similar to the grading key my teacher have provided!!

For example: Reno vs Condon is one of the supreme court cases listed.

In Reno vs Condon: The national government can restrict how states gather, circulate and sell info about citizens.

To make it related to the Unborn Protection Act( abortion); You say that the national government The national government can restrict how states gather circulate and sell( promote) abortions.

In the under Required Acts ( founded in scanned document) Women are required to submit a packet to the government.

The way you use that is saying : Reno vs Condon allows to regulate individuals and state activities by requiring women to submit a packet of their reproductive health.

This Finding stated that statistically, 50 million lives have been lost through abortion either legal or illegal. These lives would have grown the US population hence increasing the Gross Domestic Product by an estimated 2%. Besides, the workforce, such as the technology and healthcare are understaffed due to the life the lost of lives that could have been there. Reno vs Condon allows Congress to decided or not through the packet that a woman has a legitimate reason to get abortion. The reason has to been beyond her control.

Take about the strengthen and weakness of the cases,still explain how this cases will strengthen your argument and ANALYSIS

Be objective!!

Cases( do not have to use all if you cannot apply it accordingly For Unborn Protection Act position)

Another example is to use Gonzales vs Raich in which concluded that: . The majority argued that Congress could ban local marijuana use because it was part of such a “class of activities”. The way to use this for abortions is by stating Congress can ban local abortion use, because was part of class of activities. The significance of doing this is that state health policy will be deeply affected, which is the weakness in the argument . It however,does strengthen Congress by allowing them to take control over matter that considered threat to the public.

Another example is Gibbions vs Odgen. As a result, the federal government has the right to regulate any type of transportation that occurs (roads, railways and even waterways). A way to use this by saying that federal government has the right regulate any type of route use to get abortions. One way prevent this is bans on abortion coverage in private insurance plans . States ban a combination of state and federal employees, those who receive coverage through Medicaid, and/or those who purchase health plans through the exchanges created by the Affordable Care Act from purchasing plans that include abortion coverage. States ban a combination of state and federal employees, those who receive coverage through Medicaid, and/or those who purchase health plans through the exchanges created by the Affordable Care Act from purchasing plans that include abortion coverage. This is part of the Prohibited Acts(4) by United States District.

Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641(1966) case use” necessary and proper clause”, A way to use is by stating that it necessary and proper for the federal government to protect unborn child because the 14th Amendment equal protection clause requires everyone( including fetus) that Congress can pass legislation that protects their right.

Steward Machine Company v. Davis

the Court held that the tax under the Social Security Act was a constitutional exercise of congressional power.
2. The Court found that the tax was uniform throughout the states and did not coerce the states in contravention of the Tenth Amendment.

Tax to protect Unborn Protection Act is a constitutional exercise of Congressional power. Tax was uniform through the states and does not coerce the state in contravention of the 10th Amendment as majority ruled

Another Case

Maine vs Taylor, in which “The Court argued that the ban was not a simple case of “arbitrary discrimination against interstate commerce”.

In this case of For Unborn Protection Act, you must say that it’s not a case of “arbitrary discrimination against women’ if state chose to regulate abortion. Because the 10th Amendment clearly states that all powers not reserved by the Constitution to the Federal government are in the hands of the States and the People. In addition, Under the Additional Prohibited States, stated that is not a necessary discrimination against women if they penalties and fined for violating section of the Prohibited Act.

McCulloch v. Maryland

Thus the McCulloch v. Maryland standard is the measure of what constitutes “appropriate legislation” under 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. Correctly viewed, 5 is a positive grant of legislative power authorizing Congress to exercise its discretion in determining whether and what legislation is needed to secure the guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment.We therefore proceed to the consideration whether 4 (e) is “appropriate legislation” to enforce the Equal Protection Clause, that is, under the McCulloch v. Maryland standard, whether 4 (e) may be regarded as an enactment to enforce the Equal Protection Clause, whether it is “plainly adapted to that end” and whether it is not prohibited by but is consistent with “the letter and spirit of the constitution.”

McCulloch V. Maryland. The federalist judge upheld the constitutionality of the bank, he read that “let the end be legitimate, let it be within the scope of the constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to that end, which are not prohibited, but consistent with the latter and spirit of the constitution, are constitutional.” This reading provides a lee way for the congress to adjudicate on the protection of the unborn act.

As long as the senate goes through the right procedures, heeding all constitutional regulations, they may be allowed by the law to pass the act. This law may be viewed as a limitation on women to choose what they want to do with their body but it also protects life. The senate just needs to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the protection of life is superior to the freedom to abort an unwanted fetus. This is fairly easy as the senate might argue that life is more important than the decision to end it for what may be termed as selfish reasons by the mothers seeking abortion. That single life will in future bring more life and hence ensure continuity of the American population and most importantly the continuity of the human race.

BE SURE TO PROVIDE WEAKNESS FOR THE AR

ARGUMENT, BUT ALSO ARGUE WHY YOUR CASE STRENGTHEN ANTI ABORTIONS. WHAT IS THE WEAKNESS ARGUMENT NOT CONSIDERING. Be objective while still arguing in favor FOR UNBORN PROTECTION ACT.

BE SURE TO DO THIS FOR THE CASES YOU ARE USING!! ANALYSIS YOUR ARGUMENT AND BE VERY DETAILED AS POSSIBLE.

Cases you have use

McCulloch V. Maryland.

Maine vs Taylor

Reno vs Condon

Gonzales vs Raich”

Gibbions vs Odgen.

United States v. E.C Knight Company

Steward Machine Company v. Davis

Every case must tie to protecting unborn children.