Health Medical Homework Help
Health Medical Homework Help. Can you help with this question
ent:
This assignment will require you to take the PICO, 5 articles and place them in a table for analysis. You will critique each article and identify the most important parts of the research, analysis, and findings.
Then you will summarize the articles by grading the research, and identifying gaps in the literature as well as possible interventions (see grading rubric and examples).
This will serve as the foundation for the work you will do in the Project/Practicum courses. As you work with your preceptor and finalize your capstone project, you will continue to build on this material. This assignment will be graded within 3-4 days of due date, with feedback provided once all grading has been completed.
This assignment enables the learners to meet Course SLO #1, 2, 3, 4
Instructions:
- Identify your PICO or research question of interest
- Gather 5 research articles on your topic: be sure to save them and submit them along with the matrix; please make sure they are PDF documents. Do not use clinical guidelines
- Review sample matrices and summaries
- Use matrix table- one for each article and critique the parts of the article using the rubric
- Be sure to identify the evaluation tool used to grade the evidence such as (See below for grading the evidence tools)
- Identify where there are issues with the articles and what gaps were not addressed with the research; be prepared this may change the way you look at your topic or may result in a slightly different direction for your area of interest. This is ok- that is what you want to accomplish with this assignment. It will really assist you as you move forward with your project.
- For this assignment you will turn in the matrix tables, summary, references and pdf copies of your 5 articles.
- Key definitions:
- Level of evidence: the process used to evaluate the level of evidence of your articles- such as Jones Hopkins, Cincinnati Children’s evaluation etc,
- Evaluation tool: use the method and describe how you arrived at the scoring or knowing that the article included all content it needed to- such as CASP;
- Instrument: What type of instrument or tool was used in the article? This could be a depression screening tool, Nurse satisfaction tool etc. Describe the instrument- how many questions, reliability- consistency with test-retest, Cronbach Alpha, inter-rater reliablity; validity with content validity, face validity
Files:
Use this form for your assignment: Article Matrix and Analysis Revised 10.2020-1.docx
Rubric: DNP 816 Rubric for Matrix and Summary 10.2020 Final v2.docx
Sample 1 Matrix_dnp816. Fall 2020 with permission.docx
Sample 2 DNP 816 Matrix Fall 2020 with permission.docx
Links to critical appraisal tools to evaluate research quality:
Joanna Briggs Institute (joannabriggs.org) Joanna Briggs Institute (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)
CASP checklists (Links to an external site.)
Mixed Method appraisal checklist McGill: (Links to an external site.)
Johns Hopkins EBP Models and Tools (Links to an external site.)
Rubric
DNP 816 Matrix Rubric 10.2020
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource information and quality |
|
7.5 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Design and Interventions |
|
7.5 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLevel of Evidence, Model and Evaluation Tool |
|
7.5 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSample and Data Collection Procedure |
|
7.5 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInstruments- Reliability and Validity |
|
7.5 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData AnalysisStatistics, LOM, findings, results |
|
7.5 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion: Significance of findings, Reliability and Validity of study, Limitations |
|
7.5 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis, Helpful and Reliable |
|
7.5 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary- Overall Synthesis of all 5 Articles |
|
20 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting quality |
|
10 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format |
|
10 pts |
||||
Total Points: 100 |